Discourse Analysis: Ideology and Identity in Newspaper Texts - Einzelansicht

Funktionen:

Veranstaltungsart	Seminar	Veranstaltungsnummer
SWS	2	Semester	SoSe 2017
Einrichtung	Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik	Sprache	englisch
Weitere Links	comment
Belegungsfristen	03.04.2017 - 20.05.2017 Belegung über PULS
Belegungsfristen	03.04.2017 - 10.05.2017 Belegung über PULS

Gruppe 1:

Vormerken: jetzt belegen / abmelden

		Tag	Zeit	Rhythmus	Dauer	Raum	Lehrperson	Ausfall-/Ausweichtermine	Max. Teilnehmer/-innen
	Seminar	Do	12:00 bis 14:00	wöchentlich	20.04.2017 bis 27.07.2017	1.19.1.16	Islentyeva		40

Kommentar	Please follow the "comment" link above for more information on comments, course readings, course requirements and grading. This seminar introduces a number of approaches to discourse as well as methods applied to the study of (newspaper) texts and aimed at the critical investigation of relevant social and political issues. In contemporary linguistics, it is sometimes assumed that discourse analysis is incompatible with the corpus-based approach. However, this can be a misleading assumption. Taking newspaper texts as a basic unit of investigation, this seminar will show how corpus linguistic techniques can be combined with methods worked out in (critical) discourse analysis in a number of ways. It has been largely acknowledged that the role of the media is crucial in the construction of ideologies and identities. The seminar aims at investigating how the media assert and perpetuate ideologically biased narratives on power in newspaper texts and at revealing which linguistic tools at the grammatical and semantic levels (metaphors, construction of key agents in the discourse) are responsible for these processes.
Literatur	<p><strong>Theoretical Texts</strong></p><ol><li>Blommaert, Jan. 2005. <em>Discourse: A critical introduction</em>. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</li><li>Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. <em>Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. </em>Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.</li><li>Fairclough, Norman. 1995. <em>Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language</em>. London: Longman.</li><li>Lakoff, George. 1993. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In Ortony, Andrew (ed.).<em> Metaphor and Thought. </em>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202–251.</li><li>Musolff. Andreas. 2012. The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. <em>Critical Discourse Studies</em> 9(3): 301-310.</li><li>Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. <em>Approaches to Discourse</em>. Oxford: Blackwell.</li><li>Van Dijk, Teun. 1993. <em>Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis.</em> Discourse and Society 4(2). 249-283.</li></ol><p><strong>Methodology: Corpus Linguistics</strong></p><ol><li>Baker, Paul. 2006. <em>Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis</em>. London: Continuum.</li><li>Hardie, A., McEnery, T. 2010. On two traditions in corpus linguistics, and what they have in common. <em>International Journal of Corpus Linguistics.</em> 15, 3, p. 384-394.</li></ol><ol start="3"><li>Mautner, Gerlinde. 2009. Corpora and critical discourse analysis. In Baker, Paul. (ed.), <em>Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. </em>London: Continuum, 32-46.</li><li>McEnery, Tony; Wilson; Andrew. 2005. <em>Corpus Linguistics</em>. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.</li><li>McEnery, Tony; Hardie; Andrew. 2012. <em>Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice.</em> Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</li></ol><p> </p><p><strong>Course Readings: Texts for Presentations and In-Class Discussions</strong></p><ol><li>Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas; McEnery, Tony. 2013. Sketching Muslims: A corpus-driven analysis of representations around the word “Muslim” in the British press 1998-2009. <em>Applied Linguistics</em> 34:3255-78.</li><li>Islentyeva, Anna. 2015. English Garden under Threat. <em>Work in Progress. Work on Progress: Beiträge kritischer Wissenschaft</em>. Doktorand*innen Jahrbuch 2015 der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung, Hamburg: VSA Verlag.</li><li>Koller, Veronika. 2004. Businesswomen and war metaphors: possessive, jealous and pugnacious? <em>Journal of Sociolinguistics</em>, Vol. 8, No. 1. p. 3-22.</li><li>Musolff, Andreas. 2015. Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1): 41 –56.</li></ol><p> </p><p><strong>Glossaries</strong></p><ol><li>Baker, Paul; Hardie, Andrew; McEnery, Anthony. 2006. <em>A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics.</em> Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.</li><li>Baker, Paul; Ellece, Sibonile. 2011. <em>Key Terms in Discourse Analysis</em>. London: Continuum.</li><li>Glossary: Corpus: Some key terms - CASS - Lancaster University: <a href="http://cass.lancs.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CASS-Gloss-final1.pdf">http://cass.lancs.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CASS-Gloss-final1.pdf</a></li></ol>

Kommentar

Please follow the "comment" link above for more information on comments, course readings, course requirements and grading.

This seminar introduces a number of approaches to discourse as well as methods applied to the study of (newspaper) texts and aimed at the critical investigation of relevant social and political issues. In contemporary linguistics, it is sometimes assumed that discourse analysis is incompatible with the corpus-based approach. However, this can be a misleading assumption. Taking newspaper texts as a basic unit of investigation, this seminar will show how corpus linguistic techniques can be combined with methods worked out in (critical) discourse analysis in a number of ways. It has been largely acknowledged that the role of the media is crucial in the construction of ideologies and identities. The seminar aims at investigating how the media assert and perpetuate ideologically biased narratives on power
in newspaper texts and at revealing which linguistic tools at the grammatical and semantic levels (metaphors, construction of key agents in the discourse) are responsible for these processes.

Literatur

Theoretical Texts<ol><li>Blommaert, Jan. 2005. Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</li><li>Charteris-Black, Jonathan. 2004. Corpus Approaches to Critical Metaphor Analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.</li><li>Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman.</li><li>Lakoff, George. 1993. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. In Ortony, Andrew (ed.). Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202–251.</li><li>Musolff. Andreas. 2012. The study of metaphor as part of critical discourse analysis. Critical Discourse Studies 9(3): 301-310.</li><li>Schiffrin, Deborah. 1994. Approaches to Discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.</li><li>Van Dijk, Teun. 1993. Principles of Critical Discourse Analysis. Discourse and Society 4(2). 249-283.</li></ol>Methodology: Corpus Linguistics<ol><li>Baker, Paul. 2006. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.</li><li>Hardie, A., McEnery, T. 2010. On two traditions in corpus linguistics, and what they have in common. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics. 15, 3, p. 384-394.</li></ol><ol start="3"><li>Mautner, Gerlinde. 2009. Corpora and critical discourse analysis. In Baker, Paul. (ed.), Contemporary Corpus Linguistics. London: Continuum, 32-46.</li><li>McEnery, Tony; Wilson; Andrew. 2005. Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.</li><li>McEnery, Tony; Hardie; Andrew. 2012. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.</li></ol> Course Readings: Texts for Presentations and In-Class Discussions<ol><li>Baker, Paul, Gabrielatos, Costas; McEnery, Tony. 2013. Sketching Muslims: A corpus-driven analysis of representations around the word “Muslim” in the British press 1998-2009. Applied Linguistics 34:3255-78.</li><li>Islentyeva, Anna. 2015. English Garden under Threat. Work in Progress. Work on Progress: Beiträge kritischer Wissenschaft. Doktorand*innen Jahrbuch 2015 der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung, Hamburg: VSA Verlag.</li><li>Koller, Veronika. 2004. Businesswomen and war metaphors: possessive, jealous and pugnacious? Journal of Sociolinguistics, Vol. 8, No. 1. p. 3-22.</li><li>Musolff, Andreas. 2015. Dehumanizing metaphors in UK immigrant debates in press and online media. Journal of Language Aggression and Conflict, 3(1): 41 –56.</li></ol> Glossaries<ol><li>Baker, Paul; Hardie, Andrew; McEnery, Anthony. 2006. A Glossary of Corpus Linguistics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.</li><li>Baker, Paul; Ellece, Sibonile. 2011. Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.</li><li>Glossary: Corpus: Some key terms - CASS - Lancaster University: <a href="http://cass.lancs.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CASS-Gloss-final1.pdf">http://cass.lancs.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/CASS-Gloss-final1.pdf</a></li></ol>

Strukturbaum

Keine Einordnung ins Vorlesungsverzeichnis vorhanden. Veranstaltung ist aus dem Semester SoSe 2017 , Aktuelles Semester: SoSe 2024