Neurolinguistic aspects and biolinguistic approaches attrition of lexis (demonstrated on examples of some Indigenous languages of Australia, Canada and Europe) - Einzelansicht

Funktionen:

Veranstaltungsart	Seminar/Übung	Veranstaltungsnummer
SWS	2	Semester	SoSe 2018
Einrichtung	Institut für Slavistik	Sprache	deutsch
Weitere Links	Kommentar
Belegungsfristen	03.04.2018 - 20.05.2018 Belegung über PULS
Belegungsfristen	03.04.2018 - 10.05.2018 Belegung über PULS

Gruppe 1:

Vormerken: jetzt belegen / abmelden

		Tag	Zeit	Rhythmus	Dauer	Raum	Lehrperson	Ausfall-/Ausweichtermine	Max. Teilnehmer/-innen
	Seminar/Übung	Do	12:00 bis 14:00	wöchentlich	12.04.2018 bis 19.07.2018	1.11.2.27	Prof. Dr. Kosta

Kommentar	Für weitere Informationen zum Kommentar, zur Literatur und zum Leistungsnachweis klicken Sie bitte oben auf den Link "Kommentar". In the sources the degree of mastery of two languages is usually represented as the cracking point. The representation of the definition always moves between two maxims: the minimum and maximum definitions. Minimal means that a person is bilingual, "[...] as soon as s/he is able to speak, understand, write or read a second language to the minimum extent" (Hullmann, 2010, p.18). Maximum, on the other hand, means that someone has complete knowledge in several languages, that is, not only receptive, but also productive competencies. According to this maximal definition, such bilinguals unite two monolinguals in one person (compare Milroy / Muysken, 1995, p. 259). Language attrition is a kind of forgetting or losing his/her FLN in grammar of a special natural language. It can be characterized as negative change (i e decline, decrease) in linguistic knowledge (competence) and/or control over that knowledge (performance), based on a comparison of two situations1 (Ammerlaan, 1987a, ) . Those who experience attrition perceive that they have adopted a different norm than more competent and fluent speakers or than what they used to have as norm. The term language attrition as used here is thus different from language shift the latter denotes partial or total replacement of one language by another, usually in a generation rather than in an individual (Ammerlaan, 1991, Tandefelt, 1992). We shall give a theoretical, methodological and empirical introduction into these phenomena. We plan also an Excursion to Ireland (Gallaway), to Lower Lusatia and Upper Lusatia and to Bretagne in order to explore how the different policies of maintaining and reclamation of languages which are endangered are treated in Germany, France and Ireland. Language attrition (LA) and language shift (LS) are related to each other like cause and effect or beginning and end of a similar process, at the beginning of which a vital language is in use and and non active use is at its end. The loss of language can be compared with loss of identity, loss of cultural heritage and loss of home, mother and father. This process does not take place spontaneously and quickly (often unchangeably), as in the case of a Wernicke or Brocca aphasia, but gradually, incrementally, and all the more unstoppably. (Motto Peter Kosta) Why are data of language attrition relevant for changes in the phylogenetic pool? Three possible scenarios which are the modus ponens for language loss Language attrition is an individual loss or reduction of competence in L1 of POPXindivid Language shift is the social common ground of many if not all individuals of a clan, tribe, group, language community, and consequence of multiplied „language attrition“ due to the dominance of another language L2 in the population POPXmagn Language attrition is the beginning and language shift or language change the consequence and result of the use of L1 of POPXmagn RoadMap: Components of verbal communication Implicit and explicit language processes Bilingual aphasia Cerebral lateralization and localization Neurofunctional modularity Neuroimaging studies of the bilingual brain An integrated perspective on bilingualism and attrition . Components of verbal communication 1.1 Implicit and explicit memory 1.2 Pragmatics/Semantics/Syntax/Prosody/Lexicon 1.3 Motivation, affect and Cultural Heritage 1.4 The Activation Treshold Hypothesis 1.5 Conslusions
Literatur	Aronin, Larissa, Britta Hufeisen (2009)(eds.).The Exploration of Multilingualism.Development of Research on L3, Multilingualism, and Multiple Language Acquisition. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins. Aronin, Larissa and Britta Hufeisen (2009). on the genesis and development of L3 research, multilingualism and multiple language acquisition: About this book. In: Aronin,Hufeisen(eds.),1o9. Aronin,Larissa and David Singleton(2012). Multilingualism.Amsterdam,Philadelphia: JohnBenjamins(Series : Studies in Language and Society30). Auer,Peter (ed.) (1998). Code Switching in Conversation.Language, Interactionand Identity.London et al.: Routledge.

Kommentar

Für weitere Informationen zum Kommentar, zur Literatur und zum Leistungsnachweis klicken Sie bitte oben auf den Link "Kommentar".

In the sources the degree of mastery of two languages is usually represented as the cracking point. The representation of the definition always moves between two maxims: the minimum and maximum definitions. Minimal means that a person is bilingual, "[...] as soon as s/he is able to speak, understand, write or read a second language to the minimum extent" (Hullmann, 2010, p.18).
Maximum, on the other hand, means that someone has complete knowledge in several languages, that is, not only receptive, but also productive competencies. According to this maximal definition, such bilinguals unite two monolinguals in one person (compare Milroy / Muysken, 1995, p. 259).

Language attrition is a kind of forgetting or losing his/her FLN in grammar of a special natural language.
It can be characterized as negative change (i e decline, decrease) in linguistic knowledge (competence) and/or control over that knowledge (performance), based on a comparison of two situations1 (Ammerlaan, 1987a, ) . Those who experience attrition perceive that they have adopted a different norm than more competent and fluent speakers or than what they used to have as norm.

The term language attrition as used here is thus different from language shift the latter denotes partial or total replacement of one language by another, usually in a generation rather than in an individual (Ammerlaan, 1991, Tandefelt, 1992).

We shall give a theoretical, methodological and empirical introduction into these phenomena.
We plan also an Excursion to Ireland (Gallaway), to Lower Lusatia and Upper Lusatia and to Bretagne in order to explore how the different policies of maintaining and reclamation of languages which are endangered are treated in Germany, France and Ireland.
Language attrition (LA) and language shift (LS) are related to each other like cause and effect or beginning and end of a similar process, at the beginning of which a vital language is in use and and non active use is at its end. The loss of language can be compared with loss of identity, loss of cultural heritage and loss of home, mother and father.
This process does not take place spontaneously and quickly (often unchangeably), as in the case of a Wernicke or Brocca aphasia, but gradually, incrementally, and all the more unstoppably. (Motto Peter Kosta)
Why are data of language attrition relevant for changes in the phylogenetic pool?
Three possible scenarios which are the modus ponens for language loss
Language attrition is an individual loss or reduction of competence in L1 of POPXindivid
Language shift is the social common ground of many if not all individuals of a clan, tribe, group, language community, and consequence of multiplied „language attrition“ due to the dominance of another language L2 in the population POPXmagn
Language attrition is the beginning and language shift or language change the consequence and result of the use of L1 of POPXmagn
RoadMap:
Components of verbal communication
Implicit and explicit language processes
Bilingual aphasia
Cerebral lateralization and localization
Neurofunctional modularity
Neuroimaging studies of the bilingual brain
An integrated perspective on bilingualism and attrition

. Components of verbal communication
1.1 Implicit and explicit memory
1.2 Pragmatics/Semantics/Syntax/Prosody/Lexicon
1.3 Motivation, affect and Cultural Heritage
1.4 The Activation Treshold Hypothesis
1.5 Conslusions

Literatur

Aronin, Larissa, Britta Hufeisen (2009)(eds.).The Exploration of Multilingualism.Development of Research on L3, Multilingualism, and Multiple Language Acquisition. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.

Aronin, Larissa and Britta Hufeisen (2009). on the genesis and development of L3 research, multilingualism and multiple language acquisition: About this book. In: Aronin,Hufeisen(eds.),1o9.
Aronin,Larissa and David Singleton(2012). Multilingualism.Amsterdam,Philadelphia: JohnBenjamins(Series : Studies in Language and Society30).
Auer,Peter (ed.) (1998). Code Switching in Conversation.Language, Interactionand Identity.London et al.: Routledge.

Strukturbaum

Keine Einordnung ins Vorlesungsverzeichnis vorhanden. Veranstaltung ist aus dem Semester SoSe 2018 , Aktuelles Semester: SoSe 2024