Top
Zur Seitennavigation oder mit Tastenkombination für den
accesskey
-Taste und Taste 1
Zum Seiteninhalt oder mit Tastenkombination für den
accesskey
und Taste 2
PULS
Foto: Matthias Friel
Datenschutz
Kontakt
Impressum
Universität Potsdam
Veranstaltungen
Modulbeschreibung
EN
SoSe 2024
Anmelden
Node1
Sie sind hier:
Startseite
Negotiating Epistemics: Language and Knowledge in Interaction - Einzelansicht
Funktionen:
Veranstaltungsart
Seminar
Veranstaltungsnummer
SWS
2
Semester
WiSe 2012/13
Einrichtung
Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik
Sprache
deutsch
Weitere Links
Kommentar
Gruppe 1:
Vormerken:
Tag
Zeit
Rhythmus
Dauer
Raum
Lehrperson
Ausfall-/Ausweichtermine
Max. Teilnehmer/-innen
Seminar
Do
16:00 bis 18:00
wöchentlich
18.10.2012 bis 07.02.2013
1.19.1.22
Kommentar
Für weitere Informationen zum Kommentar, zur Literatur und zum Leistungsnachweis klicken Sie bitte oben auf den Link "Kommentar".
Knowledge (epistemicity) is an important factor in everyday conversation. Conversationalists constantly display what they know or do not know and what they assume their interlocutors to know or not know. Thus, speakers frequently claim to have the right to perform certain actions (e.g. assessing) on the basis of their knowledge. As recipients, may index prior or d/progressed knowledge states. Some even argue that epistemic (i.e. knowledge) imbalances are what occasions a great deal of conversational talk.
In the first half of this seminar, we will review some of the latest conversation analytic research on these issues. Subsequently, we will try to explore some linguistic practices speakers use to display epistemic statuses of our own.
Prerequisites: Basic conversation analytic/interactional linguistic skills are highly recommended.
Registration: In moodle.
Literatur
Drew, P. (2012). What Drives Sequences? Research on Language and Social
Interaction 45(1). pp. 61-68 .
Gardner, R. (2007). The Right Connections: Acknowledging Epistemic
Progression in Talk. Language in Society 36. pp. 319-341 .
Goodwin, C. (1987). Forgetfulness as an Interactive Resource. Social Psychology
Quarterly 50(2)., Special Issue: Language and Social Interaction. pp. 115-130 .
Heritage, J. (1984). A Change of State Token and Aspects of its Sequential
Placement. In: J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (Eds.). Structures of Social Action. CUP. Cambridge. pp. 299-345.
Heritage, J. (2002). Oh-Prefaced Responses to Assessments - A Method of
Modifying Agreement/Disagreement. In: C.E. Ford, B.A. Fox & S.A. Thompson (Eds.). The Language of Turn and Sequence. Oxford University Press. Oxford. pp. 196-224 .
Heritage, J. (2012a). Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of
Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). pp. 1-29 .
Heritage, J. (2012b). The Epistemic Engine: Sequence Organization and
Territories of Knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction 45(1). pp. 30-52 .
Heritage, J. & G. Raymond (2005). The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic
Authority and Subordination in Talk-In-Interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly 68(1). pp. 15-38 .
Heritage, J. & G. Raymond (in press). Navigating Epistemic Landscapes:
Acquiescence, Agency & Resistence in Responses to Polar Questions. In: J.P. de Ruiter (Ed.). Questions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Küttner, U.-A. (submitted). The Epistemics of "Thats right" in American English Conversation. Journal of Pragmatics.
Stivers, T. (2005). Modified Repeats: One Method for Asserting Primary Rights
from Second Position. Research on Language and Social Interaction 38(2). pp. 131-158 .
Leistungsnachweis
In-class presentation of research results and a brief written project report.
Strukturbaum
Keine Einordnung ins Vorlesungsverzeichnis vorhanden. Veranstaltung ist aus dem Semester WiSe 2012/13 , Aktuelles Semester: SoSe 2024
© Copyright HIS
Hochschul-Informations-System eG